Follow Us!

On Bloomberg

  • Access our posts on your Bloomberg terminal: NH BLG_TICKER_SENSE

Subscribe

Newsletter Portfolio Performance

Birinyi Mailing List

  • Stay in the loop:
    Subscribe to Birinyi's free mailing list
    Email:

Online Brokers

RSS

  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Add to My Yahoo!

« Global Declines | Main | Bird Flu Spooks Markets »

Comments

Thanks for this. The press (internet) is constantly on the prowl for the next Bubble to burst. Enough already. This is a healthy process...but always scary and painful.

Yes. The comparison to 1987 is ridiculous. As you pointed out, some similarities exist, but nothing to lose sleep over. I like the stocks that have rested at their 200 day averages or have bounced off support. Good post!

-- Faisal Laljee

I believe there will be a 87 style crash but the difference is it will be in the emerging markets not the US market. I think we need a global yield curve to relate things going forward. Much of the money has been in the emerging markets for the last few years. So the behavior for the same inputs should show up there.

Regards
Max

The speculative excesses have not occurred on the S&P 500. Try comparing the Russell 2000 over the last two years to the action on the S&P 500 prior to the crash for a more apt comparision.

My memory may have faded from way back then as I was a green young man only 2 years out of college. But I don't remember everyone and their grandmother saying in Aug/Sep 1987 "this looks just like the period leading up to the 'Crash of ('29, '72, pick your year)'". Perhaps Dr Doom and a few others, but weren't they considered unduly dour until proven correct by the crash itself?

To compare to another period, 1997-98 there were plenty of people that were worried about "irrational exuberance". By 2000 even Greenspan was spouting the New Paradigm excuse. And people like me were considered unduly dour until proven correct by the crash itself.

When everyone shrugs off 2week 3-5% drops like this as "heh, another great buy the dip opportunity" that's when I will get really worried.

The fact that nearly everyone thinks 1987 is not a parallel might just make it more likely to be so. ie, The buy the dippers continue to step in and get slaughtered, adding more fuel to the selling, thus creating more of a self fulfilling prophecy.

The comparison to 1987 cannot be done using the S&P. The S&P was the market leader in 1987 and it hasn't led the market since 1998. Commodities, transports, broker/dealers, small caps, put them on the chart. The idiots have run them off of a cliff to levels not seen in 15 years to 50 years depending on the index.

And, with the market's earnings being the most cyclical in 50 years, earnings will evaporate rapidly in a slow down. The E in PE is very vulnerable. If this morning's data portends a significant slow down or more, historical perspective will have said this was a foolish time to buy the dips. Why take the risk?

But look at MID index before 1987 and 2006 and you will see amazing similarities: top to bottom ratio (8/87 to 7/84) was 2.08, now the ratio (5/06 to 10/02) is 2.099. After such run-up a significant correction is very much due.

Crash???

A Global M&A chief has estimated there is $1.5 - 2 Trillion of buying power in the hands of leveraged buyout private equity and hedge funds...and another $2.4 trillion cash on S&P constituent's books. American households hold an additional $5.8 trillion in cash and short term securities....add all this up and it equals roughly 70% of the value of the S&P 500. I fail to see any probability of a "crash" given this liquidity glut...and the steady "de-equitization" from M&A, buy backs, etc.

But build me a Wall of Worry!

Now take the same chart and replace the S&P with the Russel 2000. What do you see?

The figure by itself doesn't say that much without considering the overall level of valuations and cyclical earnings. When you take those into consideration, the probability of a crash isn't as remote as you claim.

you have the editorial of flash and clash

you have the editorial of flash and clash

you have the editorial of flash and clash

you have the editorial of flash and clash

you have the editorial of flash and clash

you have the editorial of flash and clash

you have the editorial of flash and clash

you have the editorial of flash and clash

you have the editorial of flash and clash

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blogger Sentiment

  • The Ticker Sense Blogger Sentiment Poll is a survey of the web's most prominent investment bloggers, asking "What is your outlook on the S&P 500 for the next 30 days?" Conducted on a weekly basis, the poll is sent to participants each Thursday, and the results are released on Ticker Sense each Monday. The goal of this poll is to gain a consensus view on the market from the top investment bloggers -- a community that continues to grow as a valued source of investment insight. © Copyright 2015 Ticker Sense Blogger Sentiment Poll

About Us

Birinyi In the News

About Ticker Sense

  • Ticker Sense was founded and developed by analysts at Birinyi Associates. Birinyi Associates continues to own and manage all content.